考虑到传递变参可能出现多个参数,以上测试不完全。
  使用以下代码进行第二阶段实验:
public void InvokeDynamic()
{
var e = CallDynamic2(
new { Value1 = 0, Value2 = 0L, Value3 = 0f, Value4 = 0.0, Value5 = "test" });
int v1 = e.Value1;
long v2 = e.Value2;
float v3 = e.Value3;
double v4 = e.Value4;
string v5 = e.Value5;
}
public void InvokeDictionary()
{
var dict = new Dictionary<string, object>();
dict["Value1"] = 0;
dict["Value2"] = 0L;
dict["Value3"] = 0f;
dict["Value4"] = 0.0;
dict["Value5"] = "test";
dict = CallDictionary2(dict);
int v1 = (int)dict["Value1"];
long v2 = (long)dict["Value2"];
float v3 = (float)dict["Value3"];
double v4 = (double)dict["Value4"];
string v5 = (string)dict["Value5"];
}
private dynamic CallDynamic2(dynamic test)
{
int v1 = test.Value1;
long v2 = test.Value2;
float v3 = test.Value3;
double v4 = test.Value4;
string v5 = test.Value5;
v1++;
v2++;
v3++;
v4++;
v5 += "test";
return new { Value1 = v1, Value2 = v2, Value3 = v3, Value4 = v4, Value5 = v5 };
}
private Dictionary<string, object> CallDictionary2(
Dictionary<string, object> test)
{
int v1 = (int)test["Value1"];
long v2 = (long)test["Value2"];
float v3 = (float)test["Value3"];
double v4 = (double)test["Value4"];
string v5 = (string)test["Value5"];
v1++;
v2++;
v3++;
v4++;
v5 += "test";
var dict = new Dictionary<string, object>();
dict["Value1"] = v1;
dict["Value2"] = v2;
dict["Value3"] = v3;
dict["Value4"] = v4;
dict["Value5"] = v5;
return dict;
}
  结果数据:

  后决定选择使用dynamic
  有兄弟考虑可能Box损耗了性能导致Dictionary表现不佳,
  专门做了第三阶段实验,对比dynamic和Dictionary<string,long>
  具体数据不贴了,结果是dynamic在100000量级快一倍