对比AppScan Source和Fortify扫描AltoroJ的结果
作者:网络转载 发布时间:[ 2014/9/15 13:22:44 ] 推荐标签:软件测试工具 自动化测试工具
1、漏洞总数
AppScan Source:91
Fortify:121
2、Disclaimer.htm:34(Cross-Site Scripting:DOM)的漏洞Fortify能扫描出来,AppScan Source扫描不出来
另外,Fortify能扫描出比较多Persistent类型的XSS漏洞
并且归类比较好(分DOM、Persistent、Reflected类型列出)
3、AdminLoginServlet.java:35(Password Management:Hardcoded Password)的漏洞Fortify能扫描出来,AppScan Source扫描不出来
4、Fortify扫出的DBUtil.java:238(Access Control:Database)在AppScan中被归类到SQL Injection
5、admin.jsp:18(Password Management:Empty Password)属于误报
<script language="javascript">
function confirmpass(myform)
{
if (myform.password1.value.length && (myform.password1.value==myform.password2.value))
{
return true;
}
else
{
myform.password1.value="";
myform.password2.value="";
myform.password1.focus();
alert ("Passwords do not match");
return false;
}
}
</script>
6、Fortify会报比较多这类问题:
Code Correctness:Class Does Not Implement equals
Hardcoded Domain in HTML
Hidden Field
J2EE Bad Practices
J2EE Misconfiguration
Missing Check against Null
Password Management:Password in Comment
Poor Error Handling
System Information Leak:Incomplete Servlet Error Handling
7、Fortify会报比较多transfer.jsp:32(Cross-Site Request Forgery)这类CSRF的问题,而AppScan Source没有扫出来
8、Fortify有扫出ServletUtil.java(Missing XML Validation)的问题,而AppScan Source没有扫出来
9、Fortify有扫出AdminServlet.java:65(Redundant Null Check)的问题,而AppScan Source没有扫出来
相关推荐
更新发布
功能测试和接口测试的区别
2023/3/23 14:23:39如何写好测试用例文档
2023/3/22 16:17:39常用的选择回归测试的方式有哪些?
2022/6/14 16:14:27测试流程中需要重点把关几个过程?
2021/10/18 15:37:44性能测试的七种方法
2021/9/17 15:19:29全链路压测优化思路
2021/9/14 15:42:25性能测试流程浅谈
2021/5/28 17:25:47常见的APP性能测试指标
2021/5/8 17:01:11